A deadly new disparity

The killing of Trayvon Martin raises the prospect of a new disparity: unequal enforcement of “stand your ground” legislation.

A stand your ground law states that a person may use force in self-defense when there is reasonable belief of a threat, without an obligation to retreat first. In some cases, a person may use deadly force in public areas without a duty to retreat.  Florida’s stand your ground legislation declares a person is justified in using force…against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force.

George Zimmerman is said to have shot and killed Trayvon Martin when Zimmerman, on patrol in his capacity as a neighborhood watch volunteer, spotted Martin and claimed to police he was acting suspiciously; when confronting him, Zimmerman allegedly shot and killed Trayvon.  When police arrived Zimmerman said he was feeling threatened and acting in self-defense; he was not arrested, and let go.

A question arises when the situation is reversed: is a black man permitted to carry a gun and use it in defense of his neighborhood whenever he feels threatened?  Can he patrol his neighborhood in search of suspicious behavior shown by, say, a suited white man driving slowly through the streets?  Can a black man say to police, without fear of arrest and prosecution, while standing over the body of the white man he just shot, “Just standing my ground, officers, acting in self-defense from this man dressed like a white man and acting suspiciously”?

The law might say Yes, he can.  The law looks race-neutral.  But I seriously doubt there’s any way the scenario of the previous paragraph would be permitted.  I suspect that most people, at least in states where this legislation has passed, blacks and whites, would say the very intent of this legislation, while not stated explicitly, is to give whites yet another tool to use the law to control blacks.

I acknowledge that putting my question and doubts out there is bold.  Am I trying to start a race war?  Do I want more white people killed just to even things up?  Of course not, I’m trying to stop a race war, to shed light on one that began hundreds of years ago with slavery, continued through the Jim Crow era, and continues through today.

I suggest our legislatures take steps to ensure that the intent and enforcement of this law – of all laws –  is no more harmful to one group than another.  This “stand your ground” law, enforced selectively, practically declares open season on black men, a notion reinforced by this inserted image of a gun range target sold openly in Orlando, in the same state  where Trayvon Martin was killed.

It will take activist nonprofits and activist funders to push against this legislation and to insist on equity in law enforcement and law enactment.  Is that a proper role for nonprofits and funders?  Absolutely; let’s recognize that two of the principle parties advocating for stand your ground legislation are themselves part of the nonprofit sector, 501(c)3 tax-exempt organizations supported by donations from individuals and foundations — the National Rifle Association, and the American Legislative Exchange Council.

A law-by-law and state-by-state evaluation of disparate impact of law enforcement will reveal where progress most needs to be made.

* * *

Steven E. Mayer, Ph.D. / Effective Communities Project / May 13, 2012